Remote sensing can affect load regulation performance

Back in September of 2011, I posted about what load effect was (also known as load regulation) and how it affected testing (see https://powersupplyblog.tm.agilent.com/2011/09/what-is-load-effect-and-how-does-it.html). The voltage load effect specification tells you the maximum amount you can expect the output voltage to change when you change the load current. In addition to the voltage load effect specification, some power supplies have an additional statement in the remote sensing capabilities section about changes to the voltage load effect spec when using remote sensing. These changes are sometimes referred to as load regulation degradation.

For example, the Agilent 6642A power supply (20 V, 10 A, 200 W) has a voltage load regulation specification of 2 mV. This means that for any load current change between 0 A and 10 A, the output voltage will change by no more than 2 mV. The 6642A also has a remote sensing capability spec (really, a “supplemental characteristic”). It says that each load lead is allowed to drop up to half the rated output voltage. The rated output voltage for the 6642A is 20 V, so half is 10 V meaning when remote sensing, you can drop up to 10 V on each load lead. Also included in the 6642A remote sensing capability spec is a statement about load regulation. It says that for each 1 volt change in the + output lead, you must add 3 mV to the load regulation spec. For example, if you were remote sensing and you had 0.1 ohms of resistance in your + output load lead (this could be due to the total resistance of the wire, connectors, and any relays you may have in series with the + output terminal) and you were running 10 A through the 0.1 ohms, you would have a voltage drop of 10 A x 0.1 ohms = 1 V on the + output lead. This would add 3 mV to the load regulation spec of 2 mV for a total of 5 mV.

There are other ways in which this effect can be shown in specifications. For example, when remote sensing, the Agilent 667xA Series of power supplies expresses the load regulation degradation as a formula that includes the voltage drop in the load leads, the resistance in the sense leads, and the voltage rating of the power supply. Output voltage regulation is affected by these parameters because the sense leads are part of the power supply’s feedback circuit, and these formulas describe that effect:

One more example of a way in which this effect can be shown in specifications is illustrated by the Agilent N6752A. Its load effect specification is 2 mV and goes on to say “Applies for any output load change, with a maximum load-lead drop of 1 V/lead”. So the effect of load-lead drop is already included in the load effect spec. Then, the remote sense capability section simply says that the outputs can maintain specifications with up to a 1 V drop per load lead.

When you are choosing a power supply, if you want the output voltage to be very well regulated at your load, be sure to consider all of the specifications that will affect the voltage. Be aware that as your load current  changes, the voltage can change as described by the load effect spec. Additionally, if you use remote sensing, the load effect could be more pronounced as described in the remote sensing capability section (or elsewhere). Be sure to choose a power supply that is fully specified so you are not surprised by these effects when they occur.

Watt's Up with Datalogging and Digitizing?

All of our power supplies offer the ability to take an average measurement using either the front panel or the MEAS SCPI commands.  Some of our newer power supplies have some more advanced measurement capabilities.   The two capabilities that we are going to look at today are digitized measurements and datalogging.   Let’s take a short look at each one and then talk about when to use each one.

The digitizer has been in our products for a while now.  With the digitizer, you define three parameters and the measurement uses these parameters to return an array of measurements back to you.  The three parameters are: the number of points, the time interval, and the points offset.  The number of points is pretty simple.  It is the number of measurements that you want to take as well as the size of the array that you are going to read back.  The time interval is the pace of the measurements.  This is also the time between the points in the array.  The points offset is a way that you vary the starting point of the array.  This offset can be negative to return measured points before the trigger or positive to delay the start of the measurement.  The most points that we can measure and the fastest time interval is with our N678xA SMU modules.  These modules have a time interval of 5.12 us and a total number of points of 512 Kpoints (keep in mind that 1 Kpoint is 1,024 points).  This yields a total time of 5.12 us x 512 x 1,024 which yields a result of 2.68 seconds.  So the longest measurement that you can make is 2.68 seconds.  The largest time interval that we can measure is 40,000 seconds.  Setting this with the highest number of points would yield 40,000 s x 512 x 1,024 yields a total acquisition of 20,971,520,000 seconds.  That is 666.83 years! 

The other advanced measurement capability that we are going to talk about is our datalogger.  With the datalogger, you set a total acquisition time and an integration time.  The integration time is the amount of time that the power supply will average measurements.  The measurement system is still running at its maximum digitizing rate but it is averaging those measurements and returning that averaged measurement.  The digitizer on the N6705B DC Power Analyzer also will return the maximum measured value and the minimum measured value of each integration period.  The quickest integration time on the N6705B is 20.48 us.  The only limitation in the amount of data that you can log with the internal datalogger is the file size (the maximum file size is somewhere near 2 gB).  If you want to datalog huge files, you can use the external datalog feature (I wrote another blog post about this) or use our 14585A software where the only limitation is the free space on your hard drive.  The catch on the external datalogger is that that the quickest integration time is 102 us.

So when do you use one over the other?  It is pretty simple.  When you want to make a long term measurement (days, weeks, etc.) at a fast rate you should use the datalogger.  You would use this when you are looking to measure something like long term battery drain.  If you are looking for a more short term, faster measurement you would use the digitizer.  You would use the digitizer to measure something like inrush current. 

These are a few of the great features available in our power supplies.  Please let us know if you have any questions on these features or any of the features of our power supplies.          

Open sense lead detection, additional protection for remote voltage sensing

A higher level of voltage accuracy is usually always needed for powering electronic devices under test (DUTs). Many devices provide guaranteed specifications for operating at minimum, nominal, and maximum voltages, so the voltage needs to accurate as to not require unacceptable amounts of guard banding of the voltage settings.

One very significant factor that affects the accuracy of the voltage at the DUT is the voltage drop in the wiring between the output terminals of the power supply and the actual DUT fixture, due to wiring’s inherent resistance, as shown in Figure 1.

 A standard feature of most all system DC power supplies is remote voltage sensing. Instead of the voltage being regulated at the output terminals of the DC power supply’s output terminal, it is instead sensed and regulated at the DUT itself, compensating for the voltage drop in the wiring. Additional details of this are documented in an earlier posting: “Use remote sense to regulate voltage at your load”

While remote voltage sensing addresses the problem of voltage drop in wiring affecting the voltage accuracy at the DUT, it then raises the concern of what happens if one of the sense lines becomes disconnected. Will the DC power supply voltage climb up to it maximum potential causing my DUT to be damaged?  Although this is a very legitimate concern, often the voltage is usually kept within a reasonable range of the setting by a feature referred to as “open sense lead protection”. A deeper dive on the issue of open sense lines and open sense lead protection are discussed at our posting: “What happens if remote sense leads open?”

Even with open sense lead protection and the voltage being kept within a reasonable range of the setting, this can be a concern for some customers who are relying on a high level of DC voltage accuracy at the DUT for test and calibration purposes. One categorical example of this is battery powered devices, where ADC circuits that need to precisely monitor the battery input voltage have to be accurately calibrated. If the voltage from the DC power supply has significant error, the DUT will be miss-calibrated.

One issue with open sense lead protection is it is a passive protection mechanism. It is simply a back up that takes over when a sense line is open. There is no way of knowing the sense lead is open. No error flag is set or fault condition tripped. The voltage being read back is the same as that is being regulated by the voltage sensing error amplifier, which is the same as the set voltage, so all looks fine from a read-back perspective. This is where open sense lead detection takes over. Open sense lead detection is a system that actively checks to see if the sense lines are doing their job. If not it lets the test system know there is a fault.

Open sense detection is not a common feature for most system DC power supplies. As one example we do employ it in our 663xx series Mobile Communications DC Sources as these are used for powering, testing and calibrating battery powered wireless devices. In the case of an open sense line condition it generates a fault condition and it keeps the output of the DC source powered down. It also provides status information on which of the sense lines are open as well.

What is a power supply’s over current protect (OCP) and how does it work?

One feature we include in our Agilent system DC power supplies for providing additional safeguard for overload-sensitive DUTs is over current protect, or OCP. While some may think this is something separate and independent of current limiting, OCP actually works in concert with current limiting.

Current limiting protects overload-sensitive DUTs by limiting the maximum current that can be drawn by the DUT to a safe level. There are actually a variety of current limit schemes, depending on the level of protection required to safeguard the DUT during overload. Often the current limit is relatively constant, but sometimes it is not, depending on what is best suited for the particular DUT. Additional insights on current limits are provided in an earlier posting, entitled “Types of current limits for over-current protection on DC power supplies“.

By limiting the current to a set level may DUTs are adequately protect from too much current and potential damage. When in current limit, if the overload goes away the power supply automatically goes back to constant voltage (CV) operation. However, current limit may not be quite enough for some DUTs that are very sensitive to overloads. This is where OCP works together with the current limit to provide an additional level of protection. With OCP turned on, when the DC power supply enters into current limit OCP takes over after a specified time delay and shuts down the output of the DC power supply. The delay time is programmable. This prevents OCP from shutting down the DC power supply from short current spikes and other acceptably short overloads that are not considered harmful. Like over voltage protect or OVP, after tripping the output needs to be disabled and an Output Protect Clear needs to be exercised in order to reset the power supply so that its output can be re-enabled.  Unlike OVP, OCP can be turned on and off and its default is usually off. In comparison, OVP is usually always enabled and cannot be turned off. A typical OCP event is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: OCP operation

When powering DUTs, either on the bench or in a production test system, it is always imperative that adequate safeguards are taken to protect both the DUT as well as the test equipment from inadvertent damage. Over current protect or OCP is yet another of many features incorporated in system DC power supplies you can take advantage of to protect overload-sensitive DUTs from damage during test!

Overvoltage protection: some background and history

In my previous post, I talked about some of the differences between sensing an overvoltage condition on the output terminals of a power supply and sensing on the sense terminals. In this post, I want to cover some background and history about overvoltage protection (OVP).

OVP is a feature on a power supply that is used to prevent excessive voltage from being applied to sensitive devices that are being powered by the power supply. If the voltage at the output terminals exceeds the OVP setting, the output of the power supply shuts down, thereby protecting the device from excessive voltage. OVP is always active; you cannot turn it off. If you do not want it to activate, you should set it to a value that is much higher than the maximum voltage you expect at the output of your power supply.

An overvoltage condition can occur due to a variety of reasons:

·         Operator error - an operator can mistakenly set a voltage higher than desired

·         Internal circuit failure – an electronic circuit inside the power supply can fail causing the output voltage to rise to an undesired value

·         External power source – an external source of power, such as another power supply or battery in parallel with the output, could produce voltage that is higher than desired

Some power supply OVP designs include a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) across the output that would be quickly turned on if an overvoltage condition was detected. The SCR essentially puts a short circuit across the output to prevent the output voltage from going to a high value and staying there. The SCR circuit is sometimes called a “crowbar” circuit since it acts like taking a large piece of metal, such as a crowbar, and placing it across the power supply output terminals to protect the device under test (DUT) from excessive voltage.

Turning on an SCR across the output of a power supply as a response to an overvoltage condition originated as a result of older linear power supply designs. Linear regulators use a series pass transistor (click here for a post about linear regulators). If the series pass transistor fails shorted, all of the unregulated rail voltage inside the power supply appears across the output terminals. This voltage is higher than the maximum rated voltage of the power supply and can easily damage a DUT. When the OVP is activated, a signal is sent to turn off the series pass transistor. However, if that transistor failed shorted, the turn-off signal will be of no use. In this situation, the only way to protect the DUT is to trigger an SCR across the output to essentially short the output. Of course, the SCR circuit is designed to have a large enough capacity to handle the rail voltage and then the current that will flow when it is tripped. If a series pass transistor fails shorted, the AC input line fuse will sometimes blow when the SCR shorts which will completely disable the power supply protecting the DUT.

More recent power supply designs use switching regulation technology (click here for a post on switching regulators). Switching regulators have multiple power transistors that can fail. However, unlike the linear regulator design, when a switching transistor fails, it does not create a path between the rail voltage and the output terminals. So it is unlikely that a failed switching transistor will cause an OVP. And when an OVP activates for another reason in a switching regulator, all of the switching transistors are told to turn off, preventing any power from flowing to the output. As a result, there is no need for an SCR across the output for added protection against an overvoltage.

Decades ago, when OVP first started to be used on our power supplies (we were Hewlett-Packard back then), the OVP setting was fixed. It was internally set to maybe 10% or 20% above the maximum rated output of the power supply. Later, we provided the power supply user with the ability to crudely control the setting of the OVP by turning a potentiometer accessible through a hole in the front panel (see pictures below). The OVP range was typically adjustable from about 20% to 120% of the maximum rated output voltage of the power supply. When this feature first became available, it was offered as an add-on option for some power supply models. Later still, the front panel manually-adjustable OVP became standard on most high-performance power supplies. With advances in electronics, the OVP adjustability was moved deeper inside the supply and controlled with a DAC through front panel button presses or over an interface such as GPIB. Today, OVP is included in nearly every power supply, is set electronically, and is often a calibrated parameter to improve overall accuracy.

Protect your DUT: use sense leads for overvoltage protection (OVP)

Earlier this week, one of our military customers providing DC power to a very expensive device during test asked about the availability of a special option on one of our power supplies. He wanted the option that changed the location of the overvoltage protection (OVP) sensing terminals from the output terminals of the power supply to the sense terminals of the power supply. Since his device under test (DUT) is located quite a distance away from the power supply, he is using remote sensing to regulate the power supply voltage right at his device under test. (Click here for a post about remote sense.) And since the DUT is very expensive and sensitive to excessive voltage, he needs to protect the input of the DUT from excessive voltage as measured right at the DUT input terminals.

The power supply he is using, an Agilent N6752A installed in an N6700B mainframe, normally uses the output terminals as the sensing location for the overvoltage protection. (Click here for a post that includes a description of OVP.) OVP is used to prevent excessive voltage from being applied to sensitive devices. If the voltage at the output terminals exceeds the OVP setting, the output of the power supply shuts down. Since this customer is very interested in preventing excessive voltage from being applied to his expensive DUT, sensing for an overvoltage condition right at the DUT is important. For the N6752A, Agilent offers a special option (J01) that adds the ability to do OVP sensing with the sense leads. See Figure 1. With the J01 option added to his N6752A, the customer’s DUT is protected against excessive voltage.

You may be wondering why the standard OVP would sense at the output terminals instead of at the sense terminals. For decades, we have been making power supplies that sense OVP at the output terminals. Probably the biggest reason for sensing at the output terminals is because that approach provides more reliable protection than sensing at the sense leads even though it is less accurate. The output terminals are the power-producing terminals. If the sense leads become inadvertently shorted, the voltage at the output terminals would rise uncontrolled beyond the maximum rated output of the power supply. This uncontrolled high voltage could easily damage any device connected to the power supply’s output leads! So sensing for an overvoltage condition at the output terminals actually makes sense. It may not be the most accurate way to protect the DUT, but it is the most reliable given all of the things that can go wrong, such as a wiring error or an internal fault in the power supply.

The J01 option is available for only certain N67xx power modules. It adds the ability to sense for an overvoltage condition on the sense leads. This option does not remove the existing output terminal overvoltage sensing feature; it is in addition to it. Additionally, the J01 option is a tracking OVP option. You set a voltage value that is an offset from the programmed output voltage value. The J01 tracking overvoltage threshold tracks the real-time programming changes to the voltage setting and uses the remote sense leads to monitor the voltage.

Addressing the challenge of sequencing multiple bias supplies on and off

A challenge test engineers are perennially faced with is how to best sequence the bias voltages powering their DUT, when their DUT requires several bias voltages. Many DUTs are sensitive to sequencing and an improper sequence may lead to the DUT hanging up, or worse, suffer damage as a consequence. Not only is sequencing an issue when powering the DUT on, but it can also be an issue when powering the DUT down as well. In addition to sequencing, the slew rates of the various bias voltages can likewise be important to the DUT correctly powering on.

Simply relying on the timing of output-on and output-off commands sent from the test system controller to all the system DC power supplies individually tends to be far too imprecise, especially for critical sequencing timing requirements. The actual turn-on time of a typical system DC power supply can be many tens of milliseconds, and will vary considerably between different models of power supplies. The turn-on and turn-off times of each will need to be carefully characterized in order to know when a command for a specific bias voltage needs to be sent in relation to the other bias voltages. It is very likely the sequence of commands sent for outputs to turn on or off may be in a different sequence to the outputs actually changing, due to delay differences between different DC power supplies! An even bigger problem however is most system controllers are PCs which may randomly experience a large delay in sending out a command, if a higher level service request interrupts and pre-empts execution of the test program.

An alternative approach often taken is adding some custom hardware to control output sequencing. This can assure correct sequencing, but adds a lot of complexity, is usually inflexible, and may introduce other issues and compromises.

At Agilent we added system features to our N6700 series multiple output modular DC power system that support correct power-on and power-off sequencing. The output-on and output-off controls for the individual outputs get grouped together. The N6700 platform knows and compensates for the actual delays of all the various DC power output modules so that the desired delay value entered will be what is accurately achieved. Figure 1 shows setting up an N6705A to achieve a desired turn-on sequence of DC outputs for powering up a PC mother board. Figure 2 shows the actual result. A more detailed description of this PC motherboard example is given in our application note: “Biasing Multiple Input Voltage Devices in R&D”. While the N6705B DC Power Analyzer mainframe is regarded as being primarily for R&D, which this app note is referencing, the low profile rack-mountable N6700 series mainframes have these very same features and suit automated test systems in manufacturing and other environments.

Figure 1: Setting Output Delays

Figure 2: Output Turn-on Sequence Results

Just like setting up the power-on sequence, separate delays for power-off can also be entered, as seen in the set up screen shown in Figure 1, for the expected shut down of the DUT. However, what if there is an emergency shut down due to an abnormal condition and you still want to assure a certain power-off sequence? A colleague worked out the procedure for setting up the N6700 series DC power system to provide an orderly shutdown of the outputs, in the event of a problem on one of the outputs. In this example it happens to be an overvoltage condition on one of the outputs, but any of a number of fault conditions can be acted on to initiate an orderly shutdown. Details of this procedure are provided in another application note; “Avoid DUT Damage by Sequencing Multiple Power Inputs Off Upon a Fault Event”.

So when faced with the challenge of having to properly sequence multiple DC bias voltages powering your DUT, reconsider trying to engineer a solution to accomplish this. Instead, look for features that provide this kind of capability in the system DC power supplies you are looking to use, already built-in. It makes a lot of sense having sequencing built into the power supplies and it will make your life a lot easier!

Protecting your DUT using a power supply’s remote inhibit and fault indicator features

Paramount in most any good electronic test system is the need to adequately protect the device under test (DUT), as well as the test equipment, from inadvertent damage due to possible faults with the yet-untested DUT, accidental misconnections, misapplication of power, and a large number of other unanticipated events that can occur. It is no surprise that a lot of these unanticipated events by nature are related to the powering of the DUT. For this reason good system DC power supplies incorporate a number of features designed to protect both the DUT, as well as the power supply, in the event of an unanticipated fault occurring.  Two related protection features incorporated into our DC system power supplies are the remote inhibit and the discrete fault indicator (RI/DFI). These features provide real-time protection enabling immediate shutting down the power supply, as well as enabling the power supply to take immediate action, on the event of detecting the occurrence of an unanticipated event or fault.

The remote inhibit is a digital input control while the discrete fault indicator is a digital output control signal, incorporated into the digital I/O port on our system DC power supplies. An example of a digital I/O port is illustrated in Figure 1. When the digital I/O port is configured for fault/inhibit (also called RI/DFI) pins 1 and 2 are the open collector and emitter of an isolated transistor, to serve as a digital output control, and pin3 and 4 are the digital input and common for the inhibit control input. The remote inhibit and the fault indicator can be used independently as well as in combination, for protecting the DUT.

Figure 1: Multi-function digital I/O port on Agilent 6600A series system DC power supplies

As the name implies, the remote inhibit is a digital control input, when activated, immediately disables the DC power supply’s output. One way this is commonly used is to connect an emergency shutdown switch that can be conveniently activated in the event of a problem. This may be a large pushbutton, or it may be a switch incorporated into a fixture safety cover. This arrangement is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Remote inhibit using external switch

The fault indicator (i.e. FLT, FI, or DFI) digital output signal originates from the system DC power supply’s status system. The status system is a configurable logic system within the power supply having a number of registers that keep track of its status for operational, questionable, and standard events. Many of these events can be logically OR’ed together as needed to provide a fault output signal when particular, typically unanticipated, events occurs with the power supply. Items tracked by questionable status group register, like over voltage and over current, for example, are commonly selected and used for generating a fault output signal. An overview of the power supply status register system was discussed by a colleague in a previous posting. If you are interested in learning more; click here.

The fault indicator output can in turn be used to control an external activity for protecting the DUT, such as opening a disconnect relay to isolate the DUT, as one example, as depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Fault output controlling an external disconnect relay

For DUTs that require multiple bias voltage inputs it is usually desirable that if a fault is detected on one bias input, that the other bias inputs are immediately shut down in conjunction with the one detecting a fault. The fault outputs and remote inhibit inputs on several DC power supplies can be used in combination by chaining them together, as depicted in Figure 4, to accomplish this task, to safeguard the DUT.

Figure 4: Chaining fault indicators and remote inhibits on multiple DC power supplies

The remote inhibit and fault indicator digital control signals on system DC power supplies provide a number of ways to disable power and take other actions for safeguarding the DUT. Their action is immediate, not requiring communication to, and intervention from, the test system controller. At the same time the system DC power supply generates status signals and can issue a service request (SRQ) to the test system controller so that it is notified of a problem condition and take appropriate correction action as well. The remote inhibit and fault indicator digital control signals are just two of many features found in many good system DC power supplies to assure the DUT is always adequately protected during test!

Tips to prevent voltage droop from tripping low voltage detection circuits

There are many battery operated devices such as cell phones, hand-held two-way radios, and portable GPS’s that have low voltage detection circuits. These circuits are designed to prevent the device from trying to operate at battery voltages that are below a safe value for reliable operation of the internal circuitry. Voltage supplied by a battery located very close to the circuitry drawing current from it remains fairly rigid even when the device draws pulses of current which is often the case. However, during testing of the device, a power supply is frequently used to power the device instead of the battery. Voltage supplied by a power supply, typically located quite a distance from the circuitry drawing current, will often momentarily droop each time a positive edge of current is drawn. This momentary voltage droop can cause an undesired trip of the low voltage detection circuit in the device interrupting the test.

Here are some tips to reduce voltage droop caused by fast current changes on the output voltage of a power supply.

·         Shorten wires from power supply to DUT (device under test)

Wires have resistance (R) and inductance (L), both of which develop voltage across them when a current pulse flows through the wire. Shortening the length of wire will reduce the voltage drop developed across the R and L, reducing the droop at the DUT.

·         Use larger diameter wire from the power supply to the DUT

Larger diameter wire will have lower R, reducing the voltage developed across it when current flows

·         Install multiple runs of the same wire in parallel

Parallel wires will have lower R and lower L, again reducing the voltage developed across them when current flows

·         Lower the inductance of the wire

o   Tightly twist the plus and minus power supply output wires together

Never allow the power supply plus and minus output wires to become separated. This will substantially increase the inductance, increasing voltage drop with current, especially if the current changes quickly (V = L * dI/dt). Simply placing the wires next to each other is much better than letting them fall freely, but twisting them together is highly recommended over tightly coupling them without twisting. See example results shown below.

o   Add multiple wires in parallel

As mentioned earlier, adding multiple wires in parallel reduces inductance. The best method to use here is to twist pairs of plus and minus wires together, and then run each twisted set separately to the DUT (bundling the twisted sets together is not as effective as keeping the sets separated).

o   Use a low inductance cable

Some cables are designed specifically to have low inductance. Goertz wire is one example. Also, Temp-Flex makes low inductance cable. These types of wire can drastically lower the inductance in the path between your power supply and your DUT, greatly reducing voltage droop that occurs with current transients. However, these cables tend to be expensive.

·         Eliminate connectors

Remove as many connectors as possible between the power supply output and DUT. When current flows through a connector, voltage is dropped across the connection points.

·         Use a power supply with a low output impedance

Some power supply vendors publish output impedance graphs. Try to use one with the lowest output impedance possible. Current pulses drawn from a power supply with lower output impedance will drop less voltage than a power supply with higher output impedance.

·         Add low ESR capacitors at the power supply output

You can reduce the effective output impedance of your power supply by adding a low ESR (equivalent series resistance) cap right at the output of your power supply. Many power supplies already have output caps and fairly low output impedance, so this will help only if the caps you choose actually help to lower the overall output impedance.

·         Add low ESR capacitors right at the DUT

When current is demanded by the DUT, having a local cap right at the DUT to provide the current will greatly reduce the voltage drop on the wire running to the DUT. This is because the required current comes from the cap and does not have to flow through the wire where it would drop voltage. It is important to choose caps with low ESR. Otherwise, when the current flows out of the cap, the voltage will again droop due to the current dropping voltage across the ESR.

If you are having trouble with voltage droop due to fast current changes, each of the above tips will help to contribute to reducing the droop. If the droop is large, it is unlikely you will be able to use just one technique from above to fix it. Most likely, you will have to implement many if not all of the methods above to get the best performance possible from your test setup.

Below is a simple example showing measured droop differences when using three different wiring techniques: free falling wire, loosely coupled wire, and twisted wire. An Agilent N6751A power supply with 10 feet of 10AWG wire running between it and an Agilent 6063B electronic load was used. The N6751A was set for 5 V with a current limit of 5 A, and the load was set to switch between 1 A and 3 A with a rise time of about 10 us. Remote sense was used on the power supply, sensing at the load input. A current probe captured the current (lower waveforms) and the voltage droop was measured (upper waveforms) at the load input which was at the end of the 10 feet of wire.

You can see the voltage droop was reduced as the wires became better coupled, lowering their inductance. The droop measured 1.7 V with the wires free falling. This droop was reduced significantly to 0.84 V with loosely coupled wire. Further reduction in droop was observed when the wires were twisted: the droop measured 0.69 V.

Many of the concepts presented here are explored further in a paper co-authored several years ago by one of our other Watt’s Up? blog authors, Ed Brorein. Here is a link to that paper: http://www.home.agilent.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/EPSG083914.pdf

The Joys of Owning a DC Power Supply

Back in 2000, when I was a young man and had just begun working for Agilent., Gary came up to me and told me that there was a brand new power supply that was going to be scrapped and that I should take it.  The power supply was a 6024A 200 W autoranger that was a very old design, even at that time.  I took a look and it had analog meters and no keypad!  I questioned Gary on why I would want it and he said, “Trust me it will come in handy”.

Here it is:

Gary, being older and wiser than I was at the time, was right.  I had just started working at Agilent and I was still living with my parents so I put it in the basement.  When I moved, I took it with me to my apartment.  Since then there have been several occasions where it came in very handy. 

The first is that there is always an occasional battery that needs charging so I can hook up the 6024A and charge my batteries (we highly recommend putting a blocking diode in series with the output of the supply to protect your battery). It is controlled so there is no danger to the batteries and it totally works like a champ.

The biggest use I have had for it has been troubleshooting the various electronic gadgets that I own.  The first time I used it for this purpose was to troubleshoot my wireless router.  One day it just stopped working.  Instead of throwing it out (wireless G routers were pretty expensive at that point) I figured that I would use my power supply to determine whether it was a problem with the wall adaptor for the router or the router itself.  I bought some cables from an electronics store, grabbed my soldering iron, and hooked my router up to my DC Power Supply.  I set the voltage and the current limit and the router came to life.  All I need to do was to get a new adapter and I was good to go. 

A similar thing happened with an internet streaming box that I had connected to my TV.  All of a sudden it stopped working.  I called their tech support (a terrible experience) they told me that I had to purchase a new box.  Since I had nothing to lose, I chopped up the DC adaptor and hooked it up to my 6024A.  I wish that I took a picture.  I had the box connected to my TV being powered by my 6024A.  The box came to life and I did not need to spend 100 bucks on a new one

Not everyone is as lucky as I am to work for Agilent and get a free HP supply but if you can get your hands on any kind of programmable DC power supply I recommend taking it.  I am glad that I have my power supply and I keep it on my bench, always ready to use.

.

Types of current limits for over-current protection on DC power supplies

On a previous posting “The difference between constant current and current limit in DC power supplies”, I discussed what differentiates a DC power supply having a constant current operation in comparison to having strictly a current limit for over-current protection. In that post I had depicted one very conventional current limit behavior. However there is actually quite a variety of current limits incorporated in different DC power supplies, depending on the intended end-use of the power supply.

Fold-back Current Limit

The output characteristic of a constant voltage (CV) power supply utilizing fold-back current limiting is depicted in Figure 1. Fold-back current limiting is sometimes used to provide a higher level of protection for DUTs where excess current and power dissipation can cause damage to a DUT that has gone into an overload condition. This is accomplished by reducing both the current and voltage as the DUT goes further into overload. The short circuit current will typically be 20% to 50% of the maximum current level. A reasonable margin between the crossover current point and required maximum rated DUT current needs to be established in order to prevent false over-current tripping conditions. Due to the fold-back nature, and depending on the loading nature of the DUT, the operating point could drop down towards the short-circuit operating point once the crossover point is reached/exceeded. This would require powering the DUT down and up again in order to get back to the CV operating region.

Figure 1: Output characteristic of a CV power supply with fold-back current limiting

In addition to providing over-current protection for the DUT, fold-back current limiting is often employed in fixed output linear DC power supplies as a means for reducing worst case dissipation in the power supply itself. Under short circuit conditions the voltage normally appearing across the DUT instead appears across the power supply’s internal series linear regulator, requiring it to dissipate considerably more power than it has to under normal operating conditions. By employing fold-back current limiting the power dissipation on the series-linear regulator is greatly reduced under overload conditions, reducing the size and cost of the series-linear regulator for a given output power rating of the DC linear power supply.

Fold-forward Current Limit

A variety of loading devices, such as electric motors, DC-DC converters, and large capacitive loads can draw large peak currents at startup. Because of this they can often be better suited for being powered by a DC power supply that has a fold-forward current limit characteristic, as depicted in Figure 2. With fold-forward current limiting after exceeding the crossover current limit the current level instead continues to increase while the voltage drops while the loading increases.

Figure 2: Output characteristic of a CV power supply with fold-forward current limiting

As one example of where fold-forward current limiting is a benefit, it can help a motor start under load which otherwise would not start under other current-limits. Indeed, with fold-back current limiting, a motor may not and then it would remain stalled, due to the reduced current.

Special Purpose Current Limits

Unlike the previous current limit schemes which are widely standard practice, there is a number of other current limit circuits used, often tailored for more application-specific purposes. One example of this is the current limiting employed in our 66300 series DC sources for powering mobile phones and other battery powered mobile wireless devices. Its output characteristic is depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Agilent 66300 Series DC source output characteristics

We refer to this power supply series as battery emulator DC sources. One reason why is they are 2-quadrant DC sources.  Like a rechargeable battery, they need to be able to source current when powering the mobile device and then sink current when the mobile device is in its charging mode.  In Figure 3 there are actually two separate current limits; one for sourcing current and another for sinking current. Each has different and distinctive characteristics for specific purposes.

Many battery powered mobile wireless devices draw power and current in short, high peak bursts, especially when transmitting. To better accommodate these short, high peaks, the 66300 series DC sources have a time-limited peak current limit that is of sufficient duration to support these high peaks. They also have a programmable constant current level that will over-ride the peak current limit when the average current value of the pulsed current drain reaches this programmed level. With this approach a higher peak power mobile device can be powered from a smaller DC power source.

Just like an electronic load, when the 66300 series DC source is sinking current the limiting factor is how much power it is able to dissipate. Instead of using a fixed current limit, it uses a fold-forward characteristic current limit (although folding forward in the negative direction!). This is not done for reasons that a fold-forward current limit that was just discussed is used; it is done so higher charging currents at lower voltage levels can be accommodated, taking advantage of the available power that can be dissipated. Again, this provides the user with greater capability in comparison to using a fixed-value limit.

Other types of current limits exist for other specific reasons so it is helpful to be aware that not all current limits are the same when selecting a DC power supply for a particular application!

Reference: Agilent Technologies DC Power Supply Handbook, application note AN-90B, part number 5952-4020 “Click here to access”

The difference between constant current and current limit in DC power supplies

Constant Voltage/Constant Current (CC/CV) Power Supplies

In most of our discussions in “Watt’s Up?” on current limiting we have primarily talked about power supplies as having a constant current (CC) output characteristic. This is what is found in many lab and industrial system power supplies, including most of the power supplies provided by us. Even though the terms often get used interchangeably, there is actually a distinction between constant current and current limit. To help explain this distinction, Figure 1 illustrates the output characteristics of a constant voltage/constant current (CV/CC) power supply.

Figure 1: Operating locus of a CC/CV power supply

Five operating points are depicted in Figure 1:

1. With no load (i.e. infinite load resistance): Iout = 0 and Vout = Vset
2. With a load resistance of RL > Vset/Iset: Iout = Vset/RL and Vout = Vset
3. With a load resistance of RL = Vset/Iset: Iout = Iset and Vout = Vset
4. With a load resistance of RL < Vset/Iset: Iout = Iset and Vout = Iset*RL
5. With a short circuit (i.e. zero load resistance): Iout = Iset and Vout = 0

The advantage of a CV/CC power supply is it can be used as either a voltage source or a current source, providing reasonable performance in either mode. The point at which RL = Vset/Iset is the mode crossover point where the power supply transitions between CV and CC operation. For a CV/CC power supply there is a sharp transition between CV and CC operation. Note that for an ideal CV/CC power supply the CV slope is zero (horizontal), indicating zero output resistance for CV operation while the CC slope is infinite (vertical), indicating infinite output resistance for CC operation. Note that this is at DC. How close the slope of each mode is to ideal is what determines quality of load regulation for each.  To achieve good performance for both CV and CC modes requires carefully designed and more complex control loops for each mode. More details about using a power supply as a current source is provided in an earlier posting here, entitled: “Can a standard DC power supply be used as a current source?”

Constant Voltage/Current Limiting Power Supplies

In comparison a constant voltage/current limiting (CV/CL) power supplies are intended to be used only as a voltage source while providing over-current protection for the DUT, as well as protection for the power supply itself. Figure 2 depicts typical output characteristics of a CV/CL power supply.

Figure 2: Operating locus of a CV/CL power supply

In CV/CL power supplies the current limit may be a fixed maximum value or it may be settable. In comparison to Figure 1 CV operation is still the same. However, what is found at the current limit cross-over point there is loss of voltage regulation where the voltage starts falling off. Unlike true CC operation in a CV/CC power supply, CL operation does not typically have as sharply a defined cross-over point and once in CL it may not be tightly regulated between the cross-over and short circuit points. The reason for this is CL control circuits are usually more basic in nature in comparison to a true CC control loop. CL is meant for over-current protection only, not CC operation.  For this reason the correct use of CL is to set its value a bit higher than the maximum current required by the DUT. This assures good voltage regulation for the full range of normal loading. You may find many of the more basic bench power supplies have CV/CL operation and may not be useful as current sources as a result.

Reference: Agilent Technologies DC Power Supply Handbook, application note AN-90B, part number 5952-4020

Happy New Year! May it be a “powerful” one!!

I just want to take this opportunity to thank all of our readers for taking an interest in the Watt’s Up? blog posts. Power-related topics have been a part of our professional careers (and personal lives) for decades and we are both thrilled and honored to be able to share some of what we have learned over the years with you, our readers.

During 2012, we have seen our readership grow by more than 5 times that of 2011! And we hope to see that growth continue during 2013. To make that happen, we would like to hear from you, our readers, about what power-related topics are of greatest interest to you for 2013. Please comment below and we will be happy to post about any power-related issues you bring up!  

Finally, on behalf of Ed Brorein, Matt Carolan, and myself, and all of us at Agilent Technologies, Happy New Year! May 2013 be a “powerful” year for you all!!

Two-quadrant power supplies are better than one!

Back in October, I posted an explanation about what was a bipolar (four-quadrant) power supply (see post here: https://powersupplyblog.tm.agilent.com/2012/10/what-is-bipolar-four-quadrant-power.html). That post covered two-quadrant supplies as well. Last week, while in Lorton, Virginia, I had an opportunity to meet with some of our U.S. Army customers  - engineers working at Fort Belvoir. Many of the engineers worked in the Counter Measures Research Laboratory (CMRL). While they are very careful to not reveal any details about the specifics of the work they do, one of the engineers shared a story with me about two-quadrant operation that is worth repeating.

The story was told while I was providing a demonstration of one of our power supplies, the N6705B DC Power Analyzer (see Figure 1). I was explaining to a group of engineers that some of the 34 power modules that can be installed in the N6705B are two-quadrant power supplies: they can source current and also sink current at one voltage polarity. Other power modules are four-quadrant power supplies: they can source and sink current, and provide positive or negative voltage. This explanation inspired one of the engineers to tell the group that the N6705B helped him solve a problem!

A battery operated device (he did not mention what it was) came into his lab because it was not functioning properly: it had some type of intermittent problem. In an attempt to reproduce the problem, he removed the battery and connected the device’s power input terminals to a power supply on his lab bench. But even after running the device for long periods of time and through all of its operating modes, he was unable to reproduce the intermittent problem.

One of his colleagues suggested he try connecting the device to a two-quadrant power supply installed in the N6705B they owned. The original power supply he was using was a one-quadrant supply – it could source power, but could not absorb power. The battery that normally powers the device can source and sink (absorb) power, so perhaps a power supply that more closely mimicked the behavior of the battery could help uncover the problem. Well, this worked! With the device connected to the two-quadrant power supply in the N6705B, the intermittent problem showed up again proving that it was related to the battery being able to source and sink power – a power supply with similar characteristics was needed. Apparently, the device has a mode in which it momentarily forces current back out of the battery input terminals. That current is normally absorbed by the battery. And during that time, this intermittent problem must show up. During test, a single-quadrant power supply is unable to absorb the power and therefore does not reveal the problem. A two-quadrant power supply can sink the momentary current, and the problem was back, enabling the engineer to track it down and eliminate it! See Figure 2 for an example of the output characteristic of a two-quadrant power supply.

This example demonstrates the importance of choosing a power supply with the right output characteristics for your test. When testing a device or circuit with a power supply, the closer that power supply’s behavior is to the actual power used with the device or circuit, the more you will reveal about the actual performance of your device or circuit.  There are applications in which a two-quadrant power supply will better replicate a battery’s behavior than a single-quadrant power supply, even if you don’t expect the battery to absorb power during test. One CMRL engineer experienced this firsthand.

More on power supply current source-to-sink crossover characteristics

On my earlier posting “Power supply current source-to-sink crossover characteristics” I showed what the effects on the output voltage of a unipolar two-quadrant-power supply were, resulting from the output current on the power supply transitioning between sourcing and sinking. In that example scenario, the power supply was maintaining a constant output voltage and the transitioning between sourcing and sinking current was dictated by the external device connected to and being powered by the power supply. This is perhaps the most common scenario one will encounter that will drive the power supply between sourcing current and sinking current.

Other scenarios do exist that will drive a unipolar two-quadrant power supply to transition between sourcing and sinking output current. One scenario is nearly identical to the earlier posting. However, instead of the device transitioning its voltage between being less and greater than the power supply powering it, the power supply instead transitions its voltage between being less and greater than the active device being normally powered.  A set up for evaluating this scenario on an Agilent N6781A two-quadrant DC source is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Evaluating current source-to-sink crossover on an N6781A operating in constant voltage

In this scenario having the DC source operating as a voltage source and transitioning between 1.5 and 4.5 volts causes the current to transition between -0.75 and +0.75A.  The voltage and current waveforms captured on an oscilloscope are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Voltage and current waveforms for the set up in Figure 1

The waveforms in Figure 2 are as what should be expected. The actual transition points are where the current waveform passes through zero on the rising and falling edge. An expanded view to the current source-to-sink transition is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Expanded voltage and current waveforms for the set up in Figure 1

As can be seen the voltage ramp transitions smoothly at the threshold point, or zero crossing point, of the current waveform. The reason being is that the DC is maintaining its operation as a voltage source. Its voltage feedback loop is always in control.

Yet one more scenario that will drive a unipolar two-quadrant source to transition between sourcing and sinking current is operate it as a current source and program is current setting between positive and negative values. In this case the device under test that was used is a voltage source.  One real-world example is cycling a rechargeable battery by alternately applying charging and discharging currents to it. The set up for evaluating this scenario, again using an N6781A two-quadrant DC source is depicted in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Evaluating current source-to-sink crossover on an N6781A operating in constant current

For Figure 4 the N6781A was set to operate in constant current and programmed to alternately transition between -0.75A and +0.75A current settings. The resulting voltage and current waveforms are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Voltage and current waveforms for the set up in Figure 4

The waveforms in Figure 5 are as what should be expected. The actual transition points are where the current waveform passes through zero on the rising and falling edge. An expanded view to the current source-to-sink transition is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Expanded voltage and current waveforms for the set up in Figure 4

As the N6781A is operating in current priority the interest is in how well it controls its current while transitioning through the zero-crossing point. As observed in Figure 6 it transitions smoothly through the zero-crossing point. The voltage performance is determined by the DUT, not the N6781A, as the N6781A is operating in constant current.

So what was found here is, for a unipolar two-quadrant DC source, transitioning between sourcing and sinking current should generally be virtually seamless as, under normal circumstances, should remain in either constant voltage or constant current during the entire transition.